Sustainable Environment
Climate Change Response and Adaptation (TCFD)
Governance
-
Board of Directors -
Directors and Senior Management Sustainability Committee Review climate risks and opportunities, GHG management and reduction targets; report regularly to the Board. -
Risk Management Team Consolidate risks and opportunities, track carbon reduction and energy management, and integrate climate governance information. -
Steering Team / Finance Division Climate risk assessment and response, policy and financial impact analysis, and supply chain climate risk management. -
QA / Marketing / R&D / Facilities / Procurement Energy saving and carbon reduction, water and environmental management, low-carbon innovation, green product design and sustainable supply chains. -
Human Resources / General Affairs Climate regulatory compliance, corporate carbon inventories, climate disclosures, local and social participation, environmental education and advocacy.
-
-
-
Board of Directors: Supreme oversight body.
Sustainable Development Committee: Review climate risks and opportunities, review greenhouse gas reduction targets, and report regularly to the Board.
Risk Management Task Force: Conduct inventory of risks and opportunities, execute carbon reduction management, and integrate climate governance information.
Strategies
Risk Management
Climate Risk and Opportunity Assessment
| Type | Climate risk / opportunity | Time Horizon | Potential Financial and Operational Impacts | Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transition Risk-Policy and Law | Carbon-reduction targets / carbon fees | Medium-long | Industrial electricity costs increase 15%-20% in the short term; cumulative carbon costs may increase 25%-35% in the medium to long term. | Increase the green electricity share in phases and implement process improvements, limiting the overall cost increase to 2%-5%. |
| Transition Risk-Market | Customer ESG Requirements | Short-medium-long | Under BAU, the short-term impact is about 1% of annual group revenue, increasing to 10%-20% in the medium to long term. | Establish a GHG reduction pathway and RBA management, with estimated guidance and audit costs below 0.05% of revenue. |
| Transition Risk-Market | Raw-material price increase | Short-medium-long | Coating procurement costs increase nearly 55%, affecting gross profit by about NT$158 million (approximately 11% of gross profit). | Engineering and R&D teams test new materials and diversify supply sources to spread risk. |
| Opportunity Product/Service | Develop High-Power, Low-Carbon Products | Short-medium | Traditional processes have long cycles and high chemical costs, with significant environmental compliance pressure. | Introduce thick-film printing to reduce production time by 50%, lower costs and improve the estimated gross margin by about 12%. |
Risk Management Process
-
01 Risk Identification
- NextRisk Analysis
-
02 Risk Analysis
- NextRisk Evaluation
-
03 Risk Evaluation
- NextRisk Response
-
04 Risk Response
- NextRisk Monitoring
-
05 Risk Monitoring
- NextRisk Reporting
-
06 Risk Reporting
Climate Risk Assessment
Assessed items
- Enhanced emissions-reporting obligations
- Mandates on and regulation of existing products and services
- Cost of low-carbon technology transitionManagement action
- Increased cost of raw materials
- Changing customer behaviourManagement action
- Rising mean temperatures
- Increased pricing of GHG emissionsManagement action
- Uncertainty in market signalsManagement action
- Substitution with lower-carbon products and services
- Changing consumer preferences
- Unsuccessful investment in new technologies
- Changes in precipitation patterns and extreme weather variability
- Increased stakeholder concern and negative feedback
- Increased severity of extreme weather events such as floods and cyclones
Yellow highlight = item for which management action was adopted after assessment
Climate-Related Opportunity Assessment
Assessed items
- Development and/or increased low-carbon products and services
- R&D and innovation in new products and services
- Use of low-carbon energyManagement action
- Use of more efficient production and distribution processes
- Renewable energy projects and energy-saving measuresManagement action
- Move to more efficient buildingsManagement action
- Diversification of business activities
- Use of public-sector incentives
- Access to new markets
- Energy substitution / diversification
- Reduced water usage and consumption
- Adoption of incentive-based strategies
- Use of more efficient modes of transport
- Participation in carbon markets
- Shift to decentralised energy
- Use of new technologies
- Shift in consumer preferences
Yellow highlight = item for which management action was adopted after assessment
Metrics and Targets
2030 Carbon Reduction Target
Taiwan Sites (Base Year: 2021)
GHG Intensity Reduction Target
Scope 1 & Scope 2 for Taiwan Sites
Energy Intensity Reduction Target
Scenario and Sensitivity Analysis
Sensitivity Analysis: Impact of Electricity Price Fluctuations on Profitability (2025 Baseline)
Assuming operational scale and product mix remain constant, this evaluation references the IPCC AR6 SSP scenario framework to assess the financial impact of electricity price variations. Without concurrent energy-efficiency improvements or cost pass-through, rising electricity tariffs will impose distinct pressures on corporate profitability.
SSP2-4.5 Intermediate Emissions Scenario: Transition Pathways & Financial Impact Analysis
| Timeframe | Internal Transition Pathway | Key Operational Assumptions | Expected Financial Impact | Core Management Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Short-term (~2030) |
Proactive Transition | Drive energy-saving projects, enhance manufacturing efficiency, and progressively introduce green power / Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs). | Cumulative increases in energy- and carbon-related costs remain modest, resulting in a slight drop in gross margin. | Prioritize projects with shorter payback periods; integrate these initiatives into operational planning and CapEx decisions. |
| Delayed Transition | Meet only baseline legal and customer compliance requirements; postpone energy efficiency and low-carbon investments to the medium term. | Short-term cost pressure remains low, but buffering capacity against future electricity price and carbon fee hikes will be limited. | Establish early warning mechanisms; project required capital and cash flows for future transition. | |
|
Medium-term (~2040) |
Proactive Transition | Continuously phase out high-energy equipment, adopt high-efficiency processes, and expand green power procurement. | Energy- and carbon-related cost increases remain manageable; gross margin declines slightly while order volumes stay stable. | Incorporate carbon costs and payback yields into product pricing strategies and customer negotiations. |
| Delayed Transition | Face rapidly rising carbon fees, higher electricity prices, and stricter customer demands, requiring significant one-time corrective investments. | Energy and carbon costs increase by 25%–35% (net increase of ~2%–5%), putting substantial pressure on gross margins. | Reserve CapEx and cash flow buffers; evaluate exiting high-carbon product lines. | |
|
Long-term (~2050) |
Proactive Transition | Temperatures and extreme weather risks rise; the market universally demands low-carbon and net-zero operations. |
Proactive: Costs and gross margins remain manageable. Delayed: Risk of order loss and declining competitiveness. |
Continuously invest in low-carbon processes and product innovation; reinforce business continuity planning (BCP). |
Internal Carbon Pricing (ICP) Mechanism
To mitigate climate transition risks and align with IFRS S2 requirements, TA-I Technology will gradually introduce an Internal Carbon Pricing (ICP) mechanism starting in 2026, integrating carbon costs into operational and investment decision-making to accelerate our low-carbon transition.
Implementation Mechanism (Shadow Pricing)
In the initial phase, a Shadow Price (a virtual carbon cost) will be integrated into major capital expenditures, equipment upgrades, and green energy procurement to prioritize resources for high-impact low-carbon projects.
Pricing Model & Dynamic Adjustment
We have built a dynamic evaluation model combining internal abatement costs (energy efficiency and renewable energy investments) with external factors (MOENV carbon fee regulations, market prices, and 1.5℃ (science-based pathways). The ICP framework will be regularly reviewed and adjusted to optimize our long-term decarbonization strategy.